exercise: Dialogues with categorical imperative - IV: When jogging through heavy traffic
silt-Tip-Tap-Tupp - silt - Tipp-Tapp-Tupp - silt - "? You, temperature"
silt-Tip-Tap-Tupp - silt - Tipp-Tapp-Tupp - silt - "Hm"
silt-Tip-Tap-Tupp - silt - Tipp-Tapp-Tupp - silt -
"You know, you know that you will run properly,"
silt Tip-Tap-Tupp - silt - Tipp-Tapp-Tupp - silt - "? ... if you can talk while"
silt-Tip-Tap-Tupp - silt - Tipp-Tapp-Tupp - silt -
"Oh?"
silt-Tip-Tap-Tupp - silt - Tipp-Tapp-Tupp - silt - "Yes"
silt-Tip-Tap-Tupp - silt - Tipp-Tapp-Tupp - silt -
" Pass on "
silt-Tip-Tap-Tupp - silt - Tipp-Tapp-Tupp - silt -
"? Wa "
silt-Tip-Tap-Tupp - silt - Tipp-Tapp-Tupp - silt -
" Shit "
silt-Tip-Tap-Tupp - silt - Tipp-Tapp-Tupp - silt -
" What? So, Kant, you know .. "
silt-Tip-Tap-Tupp - silt - Tipp-Tapp-Tupp - silt -
"Too late."
silt-Tip-Tap-Tupp - silt - Tipp-Tapp-Tupp - silt -
"the said Act so that the maxim ..."
silt-Tip-Tap-Tupp - silt - Tipp-Tapp-Tupp - silt -
"There, again!"
silt-Tip-Tap-Tupp - silt - Tipp-Tapp-Tupp - silt -
"... your will at any time at the same time ... "
" And again in the middle pure "
silt-Tip-Tap-Tupp - silt - Tipp-Tapp-Tupp - silt -
" Can you hear me at all "
silt-Tip-Tap-Tupp - silt - Tipp-Tapp-Tupp - Silt -
"Sure, sure - but now look out, there is again ..."
silt-Tip-Tap-Tupp - silt - Tipp-Tapp-Tupp - silt -
"Oh, have so say, if I shit chatterbox "
silt-Tip-Tap-Tupp - silt - Tipp-Tapp-Tupp - silt -
" No, not that, just ... "
silt-Tip-Tap-Tupp - silt - Tipp-Tapp-Tupp - silt -
"... could serve as a universal law."
silt-Tip-Tap-Tupp - silt - Tipp-Tapp-Tupp - silt - silt-Tip-Tap-Tupp - silt - Tipp-Tapp-Tupp - Silt - silt-Tip-Tap-Tupp - silt - Tipp-Tapp-Tupp - silt - silt-Tip-Tap-Tupp - silt - Tipp-Tapp-Tupp - silt - silt-Tip-Tap-Tupp - silt - Tip -Tapp-Tupp - silt -
"Why did you nothing? If you head for heavy "
silt-Tip-Tap-Tupp - silt - Tipp-Tapp-Tupp - silt
" No, I'm wondering if and what will the law, was that ... "
silt-Tip -Tapp-Tupp - silt - Tipp-Tapp-Tupp - silt -
"... you have to enter into any pile of pure, ..." Tip-Tapp
silt-Tupp - silt - Tipp-Tapp-Tupp - silt -
„… und ob sich dagegen aufzulehnen Wille genug ist für ein im Prinzip allgemeines Handeln, Lite.“
Saturday, January 30, 2010
How Much Does It Cost To Move A Sprinkler Head
exercise: Dialogues with categorical imperative - III: Layer under the golden M
Lite rückte ihr Schiffchen zurecht und schüttelte den Fritierkorb.
„Du, Ratur?“
„Hm, Litemausi?“ Ratur schnurrte.
„Handelst du immer so …“
„So, was, Litemausi?“
„Zweimal Pommes, ein ChickenMMazznuggets und ein KOOOlaaa!“
„Die Pommes mit Mayo?“
„Nein, Knoblauchsoße!"
„Sie meinen Sauce, hm?"
„Soße, du Klugscheißpommesschüttler.“
„HU-rrrmpff...“
"temperature"
"Yes, minne Lütte Liteschmieteschnute?
* Fritierfettgebrutzel *
" you act always in such a way that the maxim of your will at any time ... "
" Every time, my Hasenschnütchen, each ... "
" Will soon the fries? Rubbish not around here, chop, chop, I have ... "
" DU - HASS ... sss - WHAT ... SSSSSSSSS?
"Hunger!"
"So that at any time, my king of hearts, could serve as a universal law?"
"But of course, my Lille-Lite Queen of Hearts … und du
Ratur wandte sich wieder um …
„Willst jetzt SICHER DOCH NOCH MAYO DRAUF, HA?"
"Du bist sooo klug, Ratur!"
"Wer sagt das, Litelein?"
"Kant!"
"Kenn ich nicht, du?"
"Nö!"
"Wie kommt der dann auf mich?"
"Weiß nich ..."
"Das's Sokrates, Litelütt."
"Oh!"
"Mhm..."
:)
"Du, Ratur?"
"Hm?"
:)
"Ach, nur so ..."
Lite rückte ihr Schiffchen zurecht und schüttelte den Fritierkorb.
„Du, Ratur?“
„Hm, Litemausi?“ Ratur schnurrte.
„Handelst du immer so …“
„So, was, Litemausi?“
„Zweimal Pommes, ein ChickenMMazznuggets und ein KOOOlaaa!“
„Die Pommes mit Mayo?“
„Nein, Knoblauchsoße!"
„Sie meinen Sauce, hm?"
„Soße, du Klugscheißpommesschüttler.“
„HU-rrrmpff...“
"temperature"
"Yes, minne Lütte Liteschmieteschnute?
* Fritierfettgebrutzel *
" you act always in such a way that the maxim of your will at any time ... "
" Every time, my Hasenschnütchen, each ... "
" Will soon the fries? Rubbish not around here, chop, chop, I have ... "
" DU - HASS ... sss - WHAT ... SSSSSSSSS?
"Hunger!"
"So that at any time, my king of hearts, could serve as a universal law?"
"But of course, my Lille-Lite Queen of Hearts … und du
Ratur wandte sich wieder um …
„Willst jetzt SICHER DOCH NOCH MAYO DRAUF, HA?"
"Du bist sooo klug, Ratur!"
"Wer sagt das, Litelein?"
"Kant!"
"Kenn ich nicht, du?"
"Nö!"
"Wie kommt der dann auf mich?"
"Weiß nich ..."
"Das's Sokrates, Litelütt."
"Oh!"
"Mhm..."
:)
"Du, Ratur?"
"Hm?"
:)
"Ach, nur so ..."
Cd Burner On The Macbook
exercise: Dialogues with categorical imperative - II: Funeral
„Ratur König war ein Mann, der …“
„Kannten sie ihn?“
„Wen, Ratur?“
"Yes."
"Everyone who knew the dearly departed's lifetime, felt ..."
"I was his friend, his ..."
"Psst!"
"... a true caring family man, of their own interests in mind ... "
" What, "Hush," What is this?
"Not so loud!"
"Ah, so."
"... much too soon ..."
" So you were his friend."
"His alter ego!"
"Huh? What?
"pssst."
"Oh right, yes, though I myself ..."
"acted ... our dear husband ..."
"Divorced, divorced, he was"
" ... father and friend, always so that the maxim ... "
" Whether he actually was the father of which he was never a certainty! "
" Oh? "
" ... the maxim of his willing to act, his kindness, his constant search for meaning ... "
" If I say yet! "
" Just because you want to be an old ego was of him ... "
" Been? I AM! "
" ... as a universal law ... "
" What am I? Do you mean about that ... "
" Shut up! "
" would have ... may apply. We bow before us ... "
" HEY, THE ASS is not dead! "
„Ratur König war ein Mann, der …“
„Kannten sie ihn?“
„Wen, Ratur?“
"Yes."
"Everyone who knew the dearly departed's lifetime, felt ..."
"I was his friend, his ..."
"Psst!"
"... a true caring family man, of their own interests in mind ... "
" What, "Hush," What is this?
"Not so loud!"
"Ah, so."
"... much too soon ..."
" So you were his friend."
"His alter ego!"
"Huh? What?
"pssst."
"Oh right, yes, though I myself ..."
"acted ... our dear husband ..."
"Divorced, divorced, he was"
" ... father and friend, always so that the maxim ... "
" Whether he actually was the father of which he was never a certainty! "
" Oh? "
" ... the maxim of his willing to act, his kindness, his constant search for meaning ... "
" If I say yet! "
" Just because you want to be an old ego was of him ... "
" Been? I AM! "
" ... as a universal law ... "
" What am I? Do you mean about that ... "
" Shut up! "
" would have ... may apply. We bow before us ... "
" HEY, THE ASS is not dead! "
Antigua Windy Verandah
exercise: Dialogues with categorical imperative - I: road workers to jackhammer
HEY! TRRRRR - TRRRR - T - trrRRRRrrt -
"YES" King temperature lifts the helmet, wiped the sweat from his brow and laughed at Lite:
"Do you know -" TRRRRR - TRRRRR "why" TRRRRRRRRdugguduggudugguRRRRRRRRRRR - T-TRRRRRRR- TRRR - "Beer in my" TRRRR - T - trrr "nem Rei TRRR" ch, nothing expensive? "dugguduggu
" Huh? "
" Switch it off! "
" WA "
" AFTER WORK! "
"Yes, counted already?" Lite a Asphaltstückchen schuffelte across the street, "so, things too, temperature, "
" Because if my will at all times ... "
Lite considered the seat of the compressed air hose, dugguduggu the compressor chugged dugguduggudu,
" Raaaatuuuur, relevant know ... "
" Yes, well, temperature wiped from the hands his pants down, "the maxim of my will, white is the law, so it should be, according to Kant, and there ..."
TRRRRRRR T-TRRRRR - "LITE, YOU ASS"
Trrr dugguduggututdug TRRRRR-TTT - TRRRRRRRRRRRR, King gabs temperature on ... "because I just as a 'Durs' have' - free beer ... you poke"
Trrr dugguduggututdug TRRRRR-TTT - TRRRRRRRRRRRR
Trrr dugguduggututdug TRRRRR-TTT - TRRRRRRRRRRRR
- t - UN ... nnn k lack -
...
"FREE BEER?"
"Yeah, dude."
"Where?"
duggugduguuguuuguddugtuggtuduggt
"Kant"
"Do I know non."
"Yes, Lite, I thought so."
duggugduguuguuuguddugtuggtuduggt
"You and your stupid Bayern-Alpha. We 'noch'n Intelleketuellen, eh? "
" Well, yes, well, Lite, go on "
duggugduguuguuuguddugtuggtuduggt
T-T -. T - T
TRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
HEY! TRRRRR - TRRRR - T - trrRRRRrrt -
"YES" King temperature lifts the helmet, wiped the sweat from his brow and laughed at Lite:
"Do you know -" TRRRRR - TRRRRR "why" TRRRRRRRRdugguduggudugguRRRRRRRRRRR - T-TRRRRRRR- TRRR - "Beer in my" TRRRR - T - trrr "nem Rei TRRR" ch, nothing expensive? "dugguduggu
" Huh? "
" Switch it off! "
" WA "
" AFTER WORK! "
"Yes, counted already?" Lite a Asphaltstückchen schuffelte across the street, "so, things too, temperature, "
" Because if my will at all times ... "
Lite considered the seat of the compressed air hose, dugguduggu the compressor chugged dugguduggudu,
" Raaaatuuuur, relevant know ... "
" Yes, well, temperature wiped from the hands his pants down, "the maxim of my will, white is the law, so it should be, according to Kant, and there ..."
TRRRRRRR T-TRRRRR - "LITE, YOU ASS"
Trrr dugguduggututdug TRRRRR-TTT - TRRRRRRRRRRRR, King gabs temperature on ... "because I just as a 'Durs' have' - free beer ... you poke"
Trrr dugguduggututdug TRRRRR-TTT - TRRRRRRRRRRRR
Trrr dugguduggututdug TRRRRR-TTT - TRRRRRRRRRRRR
- t - UN ... nnn k lack -
...
"FREE BEER?"
"Yeah, dude."
"Where?"
duggugduguuguuuguddugtuggtuduggt
"Kant"
"Do I know non."
"Yes, Lite, I thought so."
duggugduguuguuuguddugtuggtuduggt
"You and your stupid Bayern-Alpha. We 'noch'n Intelleketuellen, eh? "
" Well, yes, well, Lite, go on "
duggugduguuguuuguddugtuggtuduggt
T-T -. T - T
TRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
Tuesday, January 26, 2010
Travelling With Atrial Fibrillation
Dyslexic and literature - dyslexia and art
would have no, explain who, what is dyslexia, may not read on.
No, who would have explained what is literature, may not read on.
This is about thoughts on dyslexia and literature. Literature in the sense of artistic expression, creative creation.
Perhaps it's all about being able to make themselves understood. to perceive
Perhaps it's all about if not already understand, yet (for exercise) can.
then the following supplemental should I: those who may not be satisfied with the explanation that literature art of written word and the teaching experience by through the written word, the characters, would rather read no further.
It is not a spelling error. It is to think about what part of the expression of a write-adding people. How much should
trace of himself and his personality to leave a man in his work, that one still calls it art?
What makes a place he was an of the marked lane of a tool, this is an iron tooth, this is a brush? Assigning tracks that allow many other criteria in addition to experts in the subject (and amateur), art works of certain people to be able to: colors, shapes, brush strokes - may often no more than physical appearance of deviations from the norm. Who will deny that the stars that look Vincent van Gogh on the "Night Café" like stars that is seen as a myopic without glasses?
Unlike the stars in the "Starry Night" in front of the van typically Gogh'scher kind painted cypress, where to play in circles, waves, spirals joined deliberately chosen strokes of the brush, also: the expression. Expression of, so we read, dyslexic.
at all - although you can idle talk in night-long discourses about, for example, fine arts, agreed to be without what is art, what constitutes a work of art remains beyond dispute:
All art is interpretation of what one has in mind. Not just representation of what is, but interpretation of what we saw, seemed to see to see, says, thinks, no matter obs fictional or faktual happens (trying to be).
What we have before us, we usually call reality. But we have never certainty! Alone, our senses are filters, obstacle, because our sense organs already - including the nerve center that what is perceived in comparison with stored information "verified" - interpret what affects them, there will never again be as it is.
An example? The vision is the main purpose of man. We think we know that our world, our universe is three dimensional. With this interpretation, we will be right as long as we limit it to the world, the universe we know, and will thereby can check. But our eye - it does not look three dimensional! The reflected by the things photons hit the retina and create a two dimensional image! Three-dimensional vision is already interpretation, visual perception is interpretation! We only used to seeing three-dimensionality to be able to take this for granted as normal.
"Normal", which is also interpretation, is an island of bliss push the social being human, in which all, to escape those who wish well be individualists, but are afraid of being marginalized, to be eccentric.
Normal is exclusion, exclusion is perceived, exclusion of truth. Exclusion of reality.
Dyslexic have a special kind of perception, interpretation (processing of information) written signs and symbols we assign to graphemes and defined groups that are word, sentence, and are ultimately place where we store important and / or search. These include the reversal of symbols (letters, words) understanding of the difficult things and so should be read in any case, often the disorientation in terms of space and time. How much guidance with respect to space and time, this poem:
(An application of the author at a university was rejected because of spelling errors in your letter.)
"Normal" is not mere interpretation, "normal" is much worse, the mass consensus. Consensus of the masses is something that the famous art and popular makes, but these are issues that have more to do with marketing than with art itself. Art can not represent a right to the consensus of the mass, the normal, everyday to be drawn qua mass and volume normalization.
departure from the truth as well as the cut off, inaccessible and therefore difficult to define is.
And so is what the mass than normal, defined as reality, only facet. If the interpretation of the reality of a Dyslexic, only the tiny advance, to be interpreted by many similar.
expression - the representation of what one perceives, imagines, feels - the re-forth transfer of what the world of resonance in us to the swing is an individual maximum and the personality of the (? ver) to expression coined, with its track, obs stroke, was formative formative intent, or - in the case of the dyslexic, which is typical of him way to wervechsln stuchbaen or become indispensable.
So I read in the inventory of KeinVerlag.eu a text by Anu, to name one of my unnamed female dyslexics, the German-language literature published on this platform, I am now aware that each adjustment proposal attacks the authenticity of the work. If I
the actress, who admits to being Dyslexic and together in Hamburg with a friend of a remarkable creative work of art created, in which she introduces herself as a fictional character, in particular cite here, so I asked them earlier for their approval. A sign of how far we are away from self-evident when it comes to exceptions from the norm. Exceptions to the norm from which we know that it is consensus reality and not truth.
All those who pride themselves on knowing what (large) literature accounts should be reading the works of widely recognized for his literary creative artists such as WB Yeats, Ernest Miller Hemingway, Agatha Christie, Edgar Allan Poe, Jules Verne and other Keep in mind (mind!) that by "normal" corrected = interpreted works read dyslexic interpret forgiveness on their part.
Ludwig Janssen, 26.1.2010
We say, then do that all of our intuition is nothing but the notion of appearance, that the things we look, these are not in themselves what we look at them, nor their relations to then are procured "(Kant, Critique of Pure Reason, 1781).It says e ien in the corridor. Dei dance bar book, verschden in the sight lines, not quite so bad but something like that. to" house "I have ien image in mind, but kiener to know "why". I wieß that I deise weakness that is only because others say that it is one that I always must make sure that there ...
would have no, explain who, what is dyslexia, may not read on.
No, who would have explained what is literature, may not read on.
This is about thoughts on dyslexia and literature. Literature in the sense of artistic expression, creative creation.
Perhaps it's all about being able to make themselves understood. to perceive
Perhaps it's all about if not already understand, yet (for exercise) can.
then the following supplemental should I: those who may not be satisfied with the explanation that literature art of written word and the teaching experience by through the written word, the characters, would rather read no further.
It is not a spelling error. It is to think about what part of the expression of a write-adding people. How much should
trace of himself and his personality to leave a man in his work, that one still calls it art?
What makes a place he was an of the marked lane of a tool, this is an iron tooth, this is a brush? Assigning tracks that allow many other criteria in addition to experts in the subject (and amateur), art works of certain people to be able to: colors, shapes, brush strokes - may often no more than physical appearance of deviations from the norm. Who will deny that the stars that look Vincent van Gogh on the "Night Café" like stars that is seen as a myopic without glasses?
Unlike the stars in the "Starry Night" in front of the van typically Gogh'scher kind painted cypress, where to play in circles, waves, spirals joined deliberately chosen strokes of the brush, also: the expression. Expression of, so we read, dyslexic.
at all - although you can idle talk in night-long discourses about, for example, fine arts, agreed to be without what is art, what constitutes a work of art remains beyond dispute:
All art is interpretation of what one has in mind. Not just representation of what is, but interpretation of what we saw, seemed to see to see, says, thinks, no matter obs fictional or faktual happens (trying to be).
What we have before us, we usually call reality. But we have never certainty! Alone, our senses are filters, obstacle, because our sense organs already - including the nerve center that what is perceived in comparison with stored information "verified" - interpret what affects them, there will never again be as it is.
An example? The vision is the main purpose of man. We think we know that our world, our universe is three dimensional. With this interpretation, we will be right as long as we limit it to the world, the universe we know, and will thereby can check. But our eye - it does not look three dimensional! The reflected by the things photons hit the retina and create a two dimensional image! Three-dimensional vision is already interpretation, visual perception is interpretation! We only used to seeing three-dimensionality to be able to take this for granted as normal.
"Normal", which is also interpretation, is an island of bliss push the social being human, in which all, to escape those who wish well be individualists, but are afraid of being marginalized, to be eccentric.
Normal is exclusion, exclusion is perceived, exclusion of truth. Exclusion of reality.
Dyslexic have a special kind of perception, interpretation (processing of information) written signs and symbols we assign to graphemes and defined groups that are word, sentence, and are ultimately place where we store important and / or search. These include the reversal of symbols (letters, words) understanding of the difficult things and so should be read in any case, often the disorientation in terms of space and time. How much guidance with respect to space and time, this poem:
When You Are Old
When you are old and gray and full of sleep.
And nodding by the fire, take down this book, And slowly
read, and dream of the soft look Your eyes had
once, and of their shadows deep;
How many loved your moments of glad grace, And loved
your beauty with love false or true, But one man
loved the pilgrim soul in you,
And loved the sorrows of your changing face;
And bending down beside the glowing bars,
Murmur, a little sadly, how Love fled
And paced upon the mountains overhead
And hid his face amid a crowd of stars.
(William Butler Yeats, 1892)
(An application of the author at a university was rejected because of spelling errors in your letter.)
"Normal" is not mere interpretation, "normal" is much worse, the mass consensus. Consensus of the masses is something that the famous art and popular makes, but these are issues that have more to do with marketing than with art itself. Art can not represent a right to the consensus of the mass, the normal, everyday to be drawn qua mass and volume normalization.
departure from the truth as well as the cut off, inaccessible and therefore difficult to define is.
And so is what the mass than normal, defined as reality, only facet. If the interpretation of the reality of a Dyslexic, only the tiny advance, to be interpreted by many similar.
expression - the representation of what one perceives, imagines, feels - the re-forth transfer of what the world of resonance in us to the swing is an individual maximum and the personality of the (? ver) to expression coined, with its track, obs stroke, was formative formative intent, or - in the case of the dyslexic, which is typical of him way to wervechsln stuchbaen or become indispensable.
So I read in the inventory of KeinVerlag.eu a text by Anu, to name one of my unnamed female dyslexics, the German-language literature published on this platform, I am now aware that each adjustment proposal attacks the authenticity of the work. If I
the actress, who admits to being Dyslexic and together in Hamburg with a friend of a remarkable creative work of art created, in which she introduces herself as a fictional character, in particular cite here, so I asked them earlier for their approval. A sign of how far we are away from self-evident when it comes to exceptions from the norm. Exceptions to the norm from which we know that it is consensus reality and not truth.
All those who pride themselves on knowing what (large) literature accounts should be reading the works of widely recognized for his literary creative artists such as WB Yeats, Ernest Miller Hemingway, Agatha Christie, Edgar Allan Poe, Jules Verne and other Keep in mind (mind!) that by "normal" corrected = interpreted works read dyslexic interpret forgiveness on their part.
"Everyone is an artist. I'm saying nothing about the quality. I just say something about the theoretical possibility that is present in every man [...] The Creative I declare as the artistic, and that's my definition of art. "Joseph Beuys
Ludwig Janssen, 26.1.2010
Links:
dyslexia - distorted perception image
Canadian Dyslexia Association (dyslexic authors)
Sunday, January 24, 2010
Famous Players Ancaster Showtimes
At Schnott
I lived on a snow planet in Uniphasum, I would probably be a snowball, and you would see from above, would see:
I would.
you were different.
And elsewhere:
I looked for you, I would probably look even on the snow planet, up, always fixed to the snow into it, you know you looked down from above and saw:
That would be I do.
you were different.
And elsewhere:
If I ask you something that would look good in no other way, for so into the snow I need not speak for the whole ol flurry with his posh end tidbits, blend flakes and cold-makers - which closes each mouth, sooner or later, even the most joyous singers, yes, even those first of all. You looked down from above and saw:
I would.
you were different.
And elsewhere:
Here I am standing on a snow planet, small snowball in the snow, watch up and see:
This is not you, but also because:
You are what you are, I am what I am
I have now written in the snow, do you see?
When I look up now, I look to you like this, is not it?
Surely we will meet somewhere in the middle of these words.
Even in the snow most of all adit drifts. Or thereafter.
Ludwig Janssen © 22/04/2008
(black Remember in the subjunctive)
I lived on a snow planet in Uniphasum, I would probably be a snowball, and you would see from above, would see:
.
I would.
you were different.
And elsewhere:
I looked for you, I would probably look even on the snow planet, up, always fixed to the snow into it, you know you looked down from above and saw:
:
That would be I do.
you were different.
And elsewhere:
If I ask you something that would look good in no other way, for so into the snow I need not speak for the whole ol flurry with his posh end tidbits, blend flakes and cold-makers - which closes each mouth, sooner or later, even the most joyous singers, yes, even those first of all. You looked down from above and saw:
:
I would.
you were different.
And elsewhere:
Here I am standing on a snow planet, small snowball in the snow, watch up and see:
This is not you, but also because:
You are what you are, I am what I am
I have now written in the snow, do you see?
:)
When I look up now, I look to you like this, is not it?
Surely we will meet somewhere in the middle of these words.
Even in the snow most of all adit drifts. Or thereafter.
Ludwig Janssen © 22/04/2008
Thursday, January 14, 2010
Largest Breast Sizes In Europe By Country
to transfer the quantum-physical realities of waves and particles on philosophical truth
I distinguish between reality and always strictly true - and that one is always true at the place of their perception that others, however, nowhere really.
Ludwig Janssen 1/14/2010
I distinguish between reality and always strictly true - and that one is always true at the place of their perception that others, however, nowhere really.
Ludwig Janssen 1/14/2010
Wednesday, January 13, 2010
Streaming Body Of Influence
midnight romance
novel10: lunkel dayed the fight in front Nenster, my wat cinked Fruens Gunkeln, pumming hurr would ke - heltsame of sour soonlighted Minn
07/06/2009
novel10: lunkel dayed the fight in front Nenster, my wat cinked Fruens Gunkeln, pumming hurr would ke - heltsame of sour soonlighted Minn
07/06/2009
Tuesday, January 5, 2010
Lumps On Inside Of Nose
uppercase or lowercase? Language! Leave
Überrascht es, dass ein Mensch ein wertvolles Instrument seiner Sprache zu differenziertem Ausdruck aus der Hand geben möchte, um nicht seine Kaffeetasse absetzen zu müssen?
Wenig überraschend ist, dass manche Dinge von jedem Menschen neu entdeckt werden. So zum Beispiel das Laufen. Dabei gibt es im Grunde nur eine einzige Möglichkeit zu laufen, oder? Hm – da wäre das Laufen auf den Füßen, vorwärts, rückwärts, auf den Händen … Bei gelassener Betrachtung der Möglichkeiten dessen, was man gemeinhin Laufen nennt, scheint es mehrere Möglichkeiten zu geben, sich auf die so bezeichnete Weise fortzubewegen, to reach a target or somewhere.
Then the talk - all to whom it is possible to learn to develop their own language, understand the only well-meaning family members, later one that is common in the surrounding culture, and later possibly other languages. That is, one is to be united, an advantage because they express themselves and differentiate people can make themselves understood, not belonging to the same nation, in the same country or even brought up a different culture.
It is even said that with increasing complexity and therefore greater ability to differentiate the language that a measure of the level of development should be the culture in which it is common. As described more things you can show more subtle differences and articulate.
language is transposed into writing. From the sound is a given word string. More than that - the verbal message that is transient as the vibration of the air and almost virtual, the word is location.
A place where you are looking for meaning, a place where you stored important a place in reading - in contrast to decoherence, which makes it impossible for any one to thing materialized quantum cloud again in a cloud changed back - again can be cloud, vague, and the reader to new, own importance added.
The significance lies not in word, but the differential can I add my own language in written and spoken, the richer the instruments is that my culture gives me by the hand - so I differentiated my language and thus express myself. My language and thus the possibility of differentiated expression is larger, richer.
is amazing that since the German fight over something like case-sensitive.
A nation which, with its capitalization has a special feature of expression that lacks the notations of the languages \u200b\u200bof our neighbors.
First is a small Wikiexpediation * that the capitalization We do not always as was the lower case is more properly: from the letters in upper case (capital letters), which comes from Latin, was converted under Charles the Great, and all in lower case (small letters) are written. Lower case, then, aha.
the time of the baroque then developed the capitalization of the Germans and spread across Denmark to Norway, where it should be abolished later. Even in Germany it was controversial, and so already sued one of the brothers Grimm, a collector, do not write about the use of large initial letters for nouns.
But she stayed, the capitalization. At least in Germany and Luxembourg.
The Bauhaus movement (1925) again made a strong commitment to lower case. They said:
: [quoted by WIKIPEDIA] "We write everything small because we save time. Also: why two alphabets when one reaches the same? why capitalize when you can not talk big? "
also critical journalists of the Weimar Republic as the later murdered by the Nazis, Jewish Professor Theodor Lessing ** from Hanover campaigned for the lowercase, with the seizure of power in 1933, only once again was off the table.
"We save time."
"The spelling wird einfacher“
„Warum groß schreiben, wenn ich nicht groß sprechen kann?“
Hm. Das sind Argumente, die heutzutage noch dankbarere Abnehmer finden, die sich um Rechtschreibung wenig scheren, die schnell tippen wollen oder schlichtweg zu träge oder faul sind, die Shift-Taste zu drücken, weil sie hierzu die Kaffeetasse absetzen müssten, aus der sie gerade nuckeln.
Hinzu kommt, dass viele Unsicherheiten in der Rechtschreibung kaschiert werden, wenn man kleinschreibt.
Ist das alles, was es zu kleinschreibung zu sagen gibt? Nein.
Andere wieder schreiben klein, weil sies schick finden. Und das nicht ohne Grund. Es gibt einige literarische Vorbilder, dies vormachen. Warum also not to imitate? Leave as the Austrian Artmann, as Jelinek. Or parrot Heinrich Böll, a language that
(cited on Wikipedia), neither of information value or lose in poetry [t] when the upper to lower case passes.
.
it true, Mr. Boll? No! What about the nouns, capitalization of first letter - I do not want to miss out on them - and this is a very poetic moment of our capitalization - to be raise its head - in order to immediately and weaken at the appropriate moment and anxious and fearful are to let the things that I just stood still clear, designated, the fear, the fear, the fear.
Yes! And there is the very poetic way of expression in the Germans to bring about the lower case a language to handle, in the designation of clear conditions uses the capitalization of, in a form that lost in the things their shape, character, stop ...
a language, the relationships in the colloquial, in the name of clear the capitalization serves to bring into a form which takes things contour, character, wait ...
I, I'm German a written language, in which I could do my small letters if this expression is after me - I must just write this small. The Typeface is part of my expression is, stylistic devices, is a tool to blunt and elsewhere is unknown, as desired. To use this advantage
my language, the spelling of the style element of my expression, I will not let it out of hand.
language is a stylistic device, writing is a stylistic device, writing is a stylistic device.
fight to uppercase or lowercase is the chatter little imaginative uninitiated.
language expression is much more important than such disputes. We must make use of these style elements and possibilities of the expression of our conscious language - and to be able to defend his choice also - the latter beautifully Is when mans, but can not be.
it surprise that people would rather be a valuable tool in their language to express differentiated from the hand as her coffee cup?
No. There will be more and more amateurs as experts. But among people who deal with language and expression, or even turn them into art is one that can not differ by whether they are small write or indulge in capitalization, but in other things, also to those which do with them by our language and its different spelling possibilities opened derive from verbal or written language, created.
Ludwig Janssen, 6.1.2010
----------------------------
literature, reading tips:
* to the topic on Wikipedia
** Theodor Lessing magazine on the topic of education in the Association of the German printers, Berlin, 28 vintage, mai 1931, page 124: the large letters disappear!
Überrascht es, dass ein Mensch ein wertvolles Instrument seiner Sprache zu differenziertem Ausdruck aus der Hand geben möchte, um nicht seine Kaffeetasse absetzen zu müssen?
Wenig überraschend ist, dass manche Dinge von jedem Menschen neu entdeckt werden. So zum Beispiel das Laufen. Dabei gibt es im Grunde nur eine einzige Möglichkeit zu laufen, oder? Hm – da wäre das Laufen auf den Füßen, vorwärts, rückwärts, auf den Händen … Bei gelassener Betrachtung der Möglichkeiten dessen, was man gemeinhin Laufen nennt, scheint es mehrere Möglichkeiten zu geben, sich auf die so bezeichnete Weise fortzubewegen, to reach a target or somewhere.
Then the talk - all to whom it is possible to learn to develop their own language, understand the only well-meaning family members, later one that is common in the surrounding culture, and later possibly other languages. That is, one is to be united, an advantage because they express themselves and differentiate people can make themselves understood, not belonging to the same nation, in the same country or even brought up a different culture.
It is even said that with increasing complexity and therefore greater ability to differentiate the language that a measure of the level of development should be the culture in which it is common. As described more things you can show more subtle differences and articulate.
language is transposed into writing. From the sound is a given word string. More than that - the verbal message that is transient as the vibration of the air and almost virtual, the word is location.
A place where you are looking for meaning, a place where you stored important a place in reading - in contrast to decoherence, which makes it impossible for any one to thing materialized quantum cloud again in a cloud changed back - again can be cloud, vague, and the reader to new, own importance added.
The significance lies not in word, but the differential can I add my own language in written and spoken, the richer the instruments is that my culture gives me by the hand - so I differentiated my language and thus express myself. My language and thus the possibility of differentiated expression is larger, richer.
is amazing that since the German fight over something like case-sensitive.
A nation which, with its capitalization has a special feature of expression that lacks the notations of the languages \u200b\u200bof our neighbors.
First is a small Wikiexpediation * that the capitalization We do not always as was the lower case is more properly: from the letters in upper case (capital letters), which comes from Latin, was converted under Charles the Great, and all in lower case (small letters) are written. Lower case, then, aha.
the time of the baroque then developed the capitalization of the Germans and spread across Denmark to Norway, where it should be abolished later. Even in Germany it was controversial, and so already sued one of the brothers Grimm, a collector, do not write about the use of large initial letters for nouns.
But she stayed, the capitalization. At least in Germany and Luxembourg.
The Bauhaus movement (1925) again made a strong commitment to lower case. They said:
: [quoted by WIKIPEDIA] "We write everything small because we save time. Also: why two alphabets when one reaches the same? why capitalize when you can not talk big? "
also critical journalists of the Weimar Republic as the later murdered by the Nazis, Jewish Professor Theodor Lessing ** from Hanover campaigned for the lowercase, with the seizure of power in 1933, only once again was off the table.
"We save time."
"The spelling wird einfacher“
„Warum groß schreiben, wenn ich nicht groß sprechen kann?“
Hm. Das sind Argumente, die heutzutage noch dankbarere Abnehmer finden, die sich um Rechtschreibung wenig scheren, die schnell tippen wollen oder schlichtweg zu träge oder faul sind, die Shift-Taste zu drücken, weil sie hierzu die Kaffeetasse absetzen müssten, aus der sie gerade nuckeln.
Hinzu kommt, dass viele Unsicherheiten in der Rechtschreibung kaschiert werden, wenn man kleinschreibt.
Ist das alles, was es zu kleinschreibung zu sagen gibt? Nein.
Andere wieder schreiben klein, weil sies schick finden. Und das nicht ohne Grund. Es gibt einige literarische Vorbilder, dies vormachen. Warum also not to imitate? Leave as the Austrian Artmann, as Jelinek. Or parrot Heinrich Böll, a language that
(cited on Wikipedia), neither of information value or lose in poetry [t] when the upper to lower case passes.
.
it true, Mr. Boll? No! What about the nouns, capitalization of first letter - I do not want to miss out on them - and this is a very poetic moment of our capitalization - to be raise its head - in order to immediately and weaken at the appropriate moment and anxious and fearful are to let the things that I just stood still clear, designated, the fear, the fear, the fear.
Yes! And there is the very poetic way of expression in the Germans to bring about the lower case a language to handle, in the designation of clear conditions uses the capitalization of, in a form that lost in the things their shape, character, stop ...
a language, the relationships in the colloquial, in the name of clear the capitalization serves to bring into a form which takes things contour, character, wait ...
I, I'm German a written language, in which I could do my small letters if this expression is after me - I must just write this small. The Typeface is part of my expression is, stylistic devices, is a tool to blunt and elsewhere is unknown, as desired. To use this advantage
my language, the spelling of the style element of my expression, I will not let it out of hand.
language is a stylistic device, writing is a stylistic device, writing is a stylistic device.
fight to uppercase or lowercase is the chatter little imaginative uninitiated.
language expression is much more important than such disputes. We must make use of these style elements and possibilities of the expression of our conscious language - and to be able to defend his choice also - the latter beautifully Is when mans, but can not be.
it surprise that people would rather be a valuable tool in their language to express differentiated from the hand as her coffee cup?
No. There will be more and more amateurs as experts. But among people who deal with language and expression, or even turn them into art is one that can not differ by whether they are small write or indulge in capitalization, but in other things, also to those which do with them by our language and its different spelling possibilities opened derive from verbal or written language, created.
Ludwig Janssen, 6.1.2010
----------------------------
literature, reading tips:
* to the topic on Wikipedia
** Theodor Lessing magazine on the topic of education in the Association of the German printers, Berlin, 28 vintage, mai 1931, page 124: the large letters disappear!
Saturday, January 2, 2010
I Punched Something And My Hand Hurts
Heckling
An interjection is thrown in, just as a coin - it settles or is decided long ago, whether in a vending machine, a well or a mailbox. What happens to all the heckling, the special coin or bissi rusty, can not swim or not wishing well compatible unstamped, with no indication des Absenders oder gar mit unleserlicher Anschrift versehen?
Was, wenn ein Zwischenruf, einmal eingeworfen, stecken bleibt?
Dann: Wenn ein Zwischen ruft, drehen sich die Menschen nicht einmal um, und wenn, nach anderen Menschen, denn sie meinen zu wissen, dass es ein Zwischen nicht gibt.
Frage doch einmal auf der Straße eine beliebige Zahl Menschen, was ein Zwischen ist - sie werden seltsame Antworten bereit halten, seltzahme Antworten, die ihnen geheuer sind, vertraut, die schon lange Zeit mit ihnen im Käfig lebten oder willig an der Leine führen ließen, die herkommen auf Pfiff.
Viele werden "weiß nicht" antworten, sich abwenden, weitergehen, sich an die End type or if they are Dutch, on the cheek. Or ask them what exactly is it an intermediate, just as they knew and wanted's their turn to check whether you know compared to what they know. Some will also say that the intermediate does not exist, believe - firmly - to have the claim in law. "Rock solid" - the play between fact hiding.
between them do not like people. Because they have never seen one. Because one thing was never haunted, living in cages or running up to whistle came, the tongue was hanging from the neck of males.
The biology of the interim is unknown, so I want from the ausbreiten, was ich Zwischenrufen entnahm die mir zu Ohren kamen und dazwischen hängen blieben:
Ich habe mir gedacht, überlegt und gefaltet, dass ein Zwischenruf eigentlich unsichtbar sein muss oder zumindest unscheinbar, denn schließlich ist das Zwischen selbst unsichtbar.
Das Zwischen nistet jenseits des Erkennens. Dort legt es Eier, brütet sie aus und versorgt seine Brut mit Dingen, die es sich aus dem Diesseits des Erkennens fängt. Hierzu schlüpft es, einem Zaunkönig gleich, der eine dem Menschen scheinbar Weißdornhecke passiert wie nix, durch die Grenze des Erkennens.
Diese auch "Heisenbergsche Unschärferelation" genannte Grenze ist die Grenze zum Kleinen, ist ein Bereich, in which things seem to dissolve, and behind which there should be no things, but more waves, energy and a lot of what we think only that we neither understand nor can touch, although everything, even the greatest, it combined them and endures.
The intermediate thus has its nest behind the border. If it schlingelt by this Heisenberg hawthorn hedge, * and on our page counts, so actually in us, in the brain Kastl, Kappes, or turnip, as we call the space, which limits our imagination (such thing as a safe, or even a bank, there you can deposit, withdraw and go bankrupt without mans term notes) - So, if the matter between us, it is between things.
And that is the most significant, important, and best of all, what makes the intermediate, as this makes the interim, that things are as they are, that the world is the way you and I can see it and touch it.
The intermediate power, that everything is matter, does not adhere to a huge lump with nothing around it. This is intermediate between the quarks is between the electrons and between electrons and the atoms between molecules. That's between that aircraft carrier is as large as an aircraft carrier and not the size of a pinhead (and just as difficult). The
So between making space, and in the main room, one in the room can get our driver never - even though he is in the midst of them in there, just like you and me and in all things: the space!
The intermediate makes it fills the gap! It is, it is said, in between, always, always, always. The
Between here! In between is so because we need as much thought to capture it and because the interim, it can at the same time with the things to the limits of the universe inflates, a thought-heavy word. In between, as well.
In between is much larger, more important and more protracted than that of mindless (not preoccupied!) People hastily thrown word. Just because the intermediate and the conditions therein. limits
limits to you think that surround them. What about the other limit, you ask me? Yes! As there is a limit to the small, which prevents our knowing it, to understand everything, so there is a limit to the greatness which is our recognition as impenetrable because it is lost like a drop of blood in the Pacific. Such a drop of blood is seen initially, then it dissolves and is no longer visible. Sharks can still taste it out, they say, but also has an end. The large but not, at least none that we can do more than imagine, and imagination is not knowledge, is an idea, some say faith. Since leaving us at some point even the power to the imagination, created with the things and we can be for a short time, we can not know and recognize.
The intermediate has this other side to its nest.
you think that this is not possible? You say that that has intermediate its nest on the other side, on the other side of the frontier of knowledge?
Have you ever seen a nest? Imagine a nest in front, surrounded by the border of knowing - all around the border, a border, from which you can not make accurate, obs is now the border with the kids or the border to the Great, is there limit, and in the middle, also in der Mitte: Das Nest des Zwischen. Das Nest des Zwischens ist also ebenso jenseits der Grenze des Erkennens, wie es zugleich inmitten des durch diese Grenzen bestimmten Raum, eines Zwischenraums(!) ist.
Darin ein Ei.
Darin alles, was wir Welt nennen oder Weltraum oder Grenze oder Zwischen oder Zwischenraum.
Auch du und ich.
Wir sind Zwischen!
Wir leben in Zwischenräumen!
Wir sind sowohl diesseits wie auch jenseits der Grenzen unseres Erkennens!
Okay. Jetzt dürfte das mit den Zwischenrufen auch klar sein, hm?
Und das alles nur, weil ich kraft meines Vorstellungsvermögens das Zwischen als kleinen Vogel mit Nest entstehen lassen und es kraft deines Imagination for a while and be able to stay.
Well, not quite. It is there in any case, the intermediate, which is known to have exhausted even without his imagination.
And God is now facing a vending machine, a well or a mailbox, wondering which button to press it, if he should want to be delighted, or even whether he provided his letter with the correct address and sufficient postage has, if anything.
Ludwig Janssen, 2 January 2010
white thorn * Not? Pricks ignorance?
An interjection is thrown in, just as a coin - it settles or is decided long ago, whether in a vending machine, a well or a mailbox. What happens to all the heckling, the special coin or bissi rusty, can not swim or not wishing well compatible unstamped, with no indication des Absenders oder gar mit unleserlicher Anschrift versehen?
Was, wenn ein Zwischenruf, einmal eingeworfen, stecken bleibt?
Dann: Wenn ein Zwischen ruft, drehen sich die Menschen nicht einmal um, und wenn, nach anderen Menschen, denn sie meinen zu wissen, dass es ein Zwischen nicht gibt.
Frage doch einmal auf der Straße eine beliebige Zahl Menschen, was ein Zwischen ist - sie werden seltsame Antworten bereit halten, seltzahme Antworten, die ihnen geheuer sind, vertraut, die schon lange Zeit mit ihnen im Käfig lebten oder willig an der Leine führen ließen, die herkommen auf Pfiff.
Viele werden "weiß nicht" antworten, sich abwenden, weitergehen, sich an die End type or if they are Dutch, on the cheek. Or ask them what exactly is it an intermediate, just as they knew and wanted's their turn to check whether you know compared to what they know. Some will also say that the intermediate does not exist, believe - firmly - to have the claim in law. "Rock solid" - the play between fact hiding.
between them do not like people. Because they have never seen one. Because one thing was never haunted, living in cages or running up to whistle came, the tongue was hanging from the neck of males.
The biology of the interim is unknown, so I want from the ausbreiten, was ich Zwischenrufen entnahm die mir zu Ohren kamen und dazwischen hängen blieben:
Ich habe mir gedacht, überlegt und gefaltet, dass ein Zwischenruf eigentlich unsichtbar sein muss oder zumindest unscheinbar, denn schließlich ist das Zwischen selbst unsichtbar.
Das Zwischen nistet jenseits des Erkennens. Dort legt es Eier, brütet sie aus und versorgt seine Brut mit Dingen, die es sich aus dem Diesseits des Erkennens fängt. Hierzu schlüpft es, einem Zaunkönig gleich, der eine dem Menschen scheinbar Weißdornhecke passiert wie nix, durch die Grenze des Erkennens.
Diese auch "Heisenbergsche Unschärferelation" genannte Grenze ist die Grenze zum Kleinen, ist ein Bereich, in which things seem to dissolve, and behind which there should be no things, but more waves, energy and a lot of what we think only that we neither understand nor can touch, although everything, even the greatest, it combined them and endures.
The intermediate thus has its nest behind the border. If it schlingelt by this Heisenberg hawthorn hedge, * and on our page counts, so actually in us, in the brain Kastl, Kappes, or turnip, as we call the space, which limits our imagination (such thing as a safe, or even a bank, there you can deposit, withdraw and go bankrupt without mans term notes) - So, if the matter between us, it is between things.
And that is the most significant, important, and best of all, what makes the intermediate, as this makes the interim, that things are as they are, that the world is the way you and I can see it and touch it.
The intermediate power, that everything is matter, does not adhere to a huge lump with nothing around it. This is intermediate between the quarks is between the electrons and between electrons and the atoms between molecules. That's between that aircraft carrier is as large as an aircraft carrier and not the size of a pinhead (and just as difficult). The
So between making space, and in the main room, one in the room can get our driver never - even though he is in the midst of them in there, just like you and me and in all things: the space!
The intermediate makes it fills the gap! It is, it is said, in between, always, always, always. The
Between here! In between is so because we need as much thought to capture it and because the interim, it can at the same time with the things to the limits of the universe inflates, a thought-heavy word. In between, as well.
In between is much larger, more important and more protracted than that of mindless (not preoccupied!) People hastily thrown word. Just because the intermediate and the conditions therein. limits
limits to you think that surround them. What about the other limit, you ask me? Yes! As there is a limit to the small, which prevents our knowing it, to understand everything, so there is a limit to the greatness which is our recognition as impenetrable because it is lost like a drop of blood in the Pacific. Such a drop of blood is seen initially, then it dissolves and is no longer visible. Sharks can still taste it out, they say, but also has an end. The large but not, at least none that we can do more than imagine, and imagination is not knowledge, is an idea, some say faith. Since leaving us at some point even the power to the imagination, created with the things and we can be for a short time, we can not know and recognize.
The intermediate has this other side to its nest.
you think that this is not possible? You say that that has intermediate its nest on the other side, on the other side of the frontier of knowledge?
Have you ever seen a nest? Imagine a nest in front, surrounded by the border of knowing - all around the border, a border, from which you can not make accurate, obs is now the border with the kids or the border to the Great, is there limit, and in the middle, also in der Mitte: Das Nest des Zwischen. Das Nest des Zwischens ist also ebenso jenseits der Grenze des Erkennens, wie es zugleich inmitten des durch diese Grenzen bestimmten Raum, eines Zwischenraums(!) ist.
Darin ein Ei.
Darin alles, was wir Welt nennen oder Weltraum oder Grenze oder Zwischen oder Zwischenraum.
Auch du und ich.
Wir sind Zwischen!
Wir leben in Zwischenräumen!
Wir sind sowohl diesseits wie auch jenseits der Grenzen unseres Erkennens!
Okay. Jetzt dürfte das mit den Zwischenrufen auch klar sein, hm?
Und das alles nur, weil ich kraft meines Vorstellungsvermögens das Zwischen als kleinen Vogel mit Nest entstehen lassen und es kraft deines Imagination for a while and be able to stay.
Well, not quite. It is there in any case, the intermediate, which is known to have exhausted even without his imagination.
And God is now facing a vending machine, a well or a mailbox, wondering which button to press it, if he should want to be delighted, or even whether he provided his letter with the correct address and sufficient postage has, if anything.
Ludwig Janssen, 2 January 2010
white thorn * Not? Pricks ignorance?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)