We say, then do that all of our intuition is nothing but the notion of appearance, that the things we look, these are not in themselves what we look at them, nor their relations to then are procured "(Kant, Critique of Pure Reason, 1781).It says e ien in the corridor. Dei dance bar book, verschden in the sight lines, not quite so bad but something like that. to" house "I have ien image in mind, but kiener to know "why". I wieß that I deise weakness that is only because others say that it is one that I always must make sure that there ...
would have no, explain who, what is dyslexia, may not read on.
No, who would have explained what is literature, may not read on.
This is about thoughts on dyslexia and literature. Literature in the sense of artistic expression, creative creation.
Perhaps it's all about being able to make themselves understood. to perceive
Perhaps it's all about if not already understand, yet (for exercise) can.
then the following supplemental should I: those who may not be satisfied with the explanation that literature art of written word and the teaching experience by through the written word, the characters, would rather read no further.
It is not a spelling error. It is to think about what part of the expression of a write-adding people. How much should
trace of himself and his personality to leave a man in his work, that one still calls it art?
What makes a place he was an of the marked lane of a tool, this is an iron tooth, this is a brush? Assigning tracks that allow many other criteria in addition to experts in the subject (and amateur), art works of certain people to be able to: colors, shapes, brush strokes - may often no more than physical appearance of deviations from the norm. Who will deny that the stars that look Vincent van Gogh on the "Night Café" like stars that is seen as a myopic without glasses?
Unlike the stars in the "Starry Night" in front of the van typically Gogh'scher kind painted cypress, where to play in circles, waves, spirals joined deliberately chosen strokes of the brush, also: the expression. Expression of, so we read, dyslexic.
at all - although you can idle talk in night-long discourses about, for example, fine arts, agreed to be without what is art, what constitutes a work of art remains beyond dispute:
All art is interpretation of what one has in mind. Not just representation of what is, but interpretation of what we saw, seemed to see to see, says, thinks, no matter obs fictional or faktual happens (trying to be).
What we have before us, we usually call reality. But we have never certainty! Alone, our senses are filters, obstacle, because our sense organs already - including the nerve center that what is perceived in comparison with stored information "verified" - interpret what affects them, there will never again be as it is.
An example? The vision is the main purpose of man. We think we know that our world, our universe is three dimensional. With this interpretation, we will be right as long as we limit it to the world, the universe we know, and will thereby can check. But our eye - it does not look three dimensional! The reflected by the things photons hit the retina and create a two dimensional image! Three-dimensional vision is already interpretation, visual perception is interpretation! We only used to seeing three-dimensionality to be able to take this for granted as normal.
"Normal", which is also interpretation, is an island of bliss push the social being human, in which all, to escape those who wish well be individualists, but are afraid of being marginalized, to be eccentric.
Normal is exclusion, exclusion is perceived, exclusion of truth. Exclusion of reality.
Dyslexic have a special kind of perception, interpretation (processing of information) written signs and symbols we assign to graphemes and defined groups that are word, sentence, and are ultimately place where we store important and / or search. These include the reversal of symbols (letters, words) understanding of the difficult things and so should be read in any case, often the disorientation in terms of space and time. How much guidance with respect to space and time, this poem:
When You Are Old
When you are old and gray and full of sleep.
And nodding by the fire, take down this book, And slowly
read, and dream of the soft look Your eyes had
once, and of their shadows deep;
How many loved your moments of glad grace, And loved
your beauty with love false or true, But one man
loved the pilgrim soul in you,
And loved the sorrows of your changing face;
And bending down beside the glowing bars,
Murmur, a little sadly, how Love fled
And paced upon the mountains overhead
And hid his face amid a crowd of stars.
(William Butler Yeats, 1892)
(An application of the author at a university was rejected because of spelling errors in your letter.)
"Normal" is not mere interpretation, "normal" is much worse, the mass consensus. Consensus of the masses is something that the famous art and popular makes, but these are issues that have more to do with marketing than with art itself. Art can not represent a right to the consensus of the mass, the normal, everyday to be drawn qua mass and volume normalization.
departure from the truth as well as the cut off, inaccessible and therefore difficult to define is.
And so is what the mass than normal, defined as reality, only facet. If the interpretation of the reality of a Dyslexic, only the tiny advance, to be interpreted by many similar.
expression - the representation of what one perceives, imagines, feels - the re-forth transfer of what the world of resonance in us to the swing is an individual maximum and the personality of the (? ver) to expression coined, with its track, obs stroke, was formative formative intent, or - in the case of the dyslexic, which is typical of him way to wervechsln stuchbaen or become indispensable.
So I read in the inventory of KeinVerlag.eu a text by Anu, to name one of my unnamed female dyslexics, the German-language literature published on this platform, I am now aware that each adjustment proposal attacks the authenticity of the work. If I
the actress, who admits to being Dyslexic and together in Hamburg with a friend of a remarkable creative work of art created, in which she introduces herself as a fictional character, in particular cite here, so I asked them earlier for their approval. A sign of how far we are away from self-evident when it comes to exceptions from the norm. Exceptions to the norm from which we know that it is consensus reality and not truth.
All those who pride themselves on knowing what (large) literature accounts should be reading the works of widely recognized for his literary creative artists such as WB Yeats, Ernest Miller Hemingway, Agatha Christie, Edgar Allan Poe, Jules Verne and other Keep in mind (mind!) that by "normal" corrected = interpreted works read dyslexic interpret forgiveness on their part.
"Everyone is an artist. I'm saying nothing about the quality. I just say something about the theoretical possibility that is present in every man [...] The Creative I declare as the artistic, and that's my definition of art. "Joseph Beuys
Ludwig Janssen, 26.1.2010
Links:
dyslexia - distorted perception image
Canadian Dyslexia Association (dyslexic authors)
0 comments:
Post a Comment