Does Megastreamingwork

CBET strategy

Ich bekomme häufiger Anfragen bestimmte Hände zu analysieren. Ihr könnt mir gerne eure Hände schicken und ich werde dann einen Post machen mit einer Analyse dazu.
Posted einfach die Hand als Kommentar zu einem Beitrag oder schreibt mir ne Nachricht (auf studivz oder so).
Falls ihr noch irgendwelche Reads habt, dann wäre das für die Analyse natürlich hifreich :-)

Die Hand wurde gestern angesprochen.
Die Frage: Warum macht TalentedTom keinen CBet?

PokerStars Game #9132920489: Hold'em No Limit ($2/$4) - 2007/03/28 - 14:46:41 (ET)
Table 'Hansa II' 6-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: mcmpan ($458.70 in chips)
Seat 2: nanonoko ($394 in chips)
Seat 3: PHAETON44 ($282.85 in chips)
Seat 4: ronneby82 ($140.30 in chips)
Seat 5: foxfox1 ($479 in chips)
Seat 6: TalentedTom ($1862.60 in chips)
nanonoko: posts small blind $2
PHAETON44: posts big blind $4

Holecards:
CALL ronneby82 mcmpan, $ 4 FOLD
foxfox1
RAISE TalentedTom, $ 16 to $ 20

FOLD FOLD FOLD nanonoko
PHAETON44
CALL ronneby82, $ 16

Tom AJo . His opponent is not particularly strong, and UTG called. Tom thought raised to isolate him.

Flop: (Pot: $ 46)
[ ]
ronneby82 CHECK: CHECK
TalentedTom:

Why Tom doing here is no CBET?
To play some role ne Reads:

1. The rally "Limp UTG and call a raise preflop" is an indicator of a pocket pair. This flop is no PP fold to a CBET (particularly on a short handed table)
2. probably know Tom, that your opponent is often called a bet on the flop. So why CBetten if you win the pot this does not?
3. The opponent is not aggressive post-flop. This is the chance that durchgechekt to River.
4. The opponent check-raised often.

schonmal who has read any book, who knows the principle of " Do not give up the lead! "
That is so much that when one has raiser should provide a more aggressive . Sure, because this one makes the pot size if you have a good hand or the opponent folded, because it represents a good hand.
But especially in cash games is extremely important to adjust the CBET-frequency !

As I started to play short handed I became immediately aware that I learn this very thing, in order not to make as much loss from failed CBET.
For in Shorthand, a CBET get called much more often, because I played a generally looser than in a full ring tables.
help for the adjustment of the above Reads.
Why should I Cbetten with two over cards when the opponent so far before 80% of CBET in the flop get called?

This is a nice transition to the idea of \u200b\u200ba new (not so new to many ;-)) Poker paradigm:
If you have a bad hand => keep small pot!
If you have a good hand = do> Pot big!

So if I have a bad hand and to have a small chance to win the pot by CBET, then I do not hold CBET.
cash game is a tournament. It is not unter Zeitdruck. Wartet auf bessere Situationen. Cbettet, wenn ihr einen Draw oder ein gutes Blatt habt, oder wenn der Gegner oft einen CBet folded.
Man muss nicht nur bei guten Händen das maximalste an Gewinn rausholen, sondern man muss auch bei schlechten Händen den Verlust so gering wie möglich halten.

Versteht man diese Thematik, dann fällt es einem auch nicht mehr so schwer den Check von Tom zu verstehen.

Klar hätte der CBet vielleicht funktionieren können. Aber was wäre, wenn er nicht funktioniert hätte?
Falls dann keine hohe Karte kommt ist er in einer schwierigen Position. Noch ein CBet wird teuer.
If he checks behind on the turn, he shouts it out formally that he has two over cards. Then comes the River, no high card, then his opponent can easily steal the pot with a bet, because Tom can call the bet.

Turn: (Pot: $ 46)
[ ] []
CHECK ronneby82:
CHECK TalentedTom:

River: (Pot: $ 46)
[ ] [ ]
ronneby82 CHECK: CHECK
TalentedTom:

Showdown:
ronneby82: shows [ ] (a pair of Threes)
TalentedTom: shows [ ] (a pair of Threes - Ace kicker)
TalentedTom collected $ 43 .70 from pot

SUMMARY:
Total pot $ 46 rumkommt, I will only take a position on what to actually happen.